NY Times Letter to the Editor by Evan Wolfson

The New York Times
October 28, 2009
To the Editor:

Re “In Battle Over Gay Marriage, Timing May Be Key,” by Adam Liptak (Sidebar column, Oct. 27):

The pivotal exchange in one of the lawsuits now challenging the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage shows that the opponents of gay people’s freedom to marry still can’t give a real answer to the key question posed in yet another court by yet another judge: “What would be the harm of permitting gay men and lesbians to marry?”

The anti-gay forces’ lawyer, Charles J. Cooper, replied, “Your Honor, my answer is: I don’t know ... I don’t know.” Mr. Cooper eventually told the judge that the government should be able to exclude gay couples from marriage in order “to channel naturally procreative sexual activity between men and women into stable, enduring unions.”

But even Justice Antonin Scalia, no friend of equality for gay people, wrote in Lawrence v. Texas: “What justification could there possibly be for denying the benefits of marriage to homosexual couples exercising ‘[t]he liberty protected by the Constitution’? Surely not the encouragement of procreation, since the sterile and the elderly are allowed to marry.”

The reason smart lawyers like Mr. Cooper don’t give a better answer to why marriage discrimination should be allowed to continue is that there isn’t one.

Evan Wolfson
Executive Director
Freedom to Marry
New York, Oct. 27, 2009
[Link]

Read More »

ABA Human Rights Magazine Names Mary L. Bonauto and Evan Wolfson Human Rights Heroes

American Bar Association Human Rights Magazine
Summer 2009


Kristen Galles writes, "Twenty years ago, the nation did not know or think much about GLBT civil rights. Now, thanks to the work of [Evan] Wolfson and [Mary] Bonauto, the nation and its legal landscape have changed and we can all look forward to a day when all citizens have the freedom to marry." (Link)

Read More »

Washington State Domestic Partnership Foes Challenge Campaign Laws

The Associated Press
October 27, 2009
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that the anti-gay group Family PAC, which opposes Washington state's expanded domestic partnership law, must abide by Washington state's campaign finance laws while a lawsuit challenging those laws moves forward. [Link]

Support expanded domestic partnership rights in Washington here.

Read More »

In Battle For Marriage Equality, Timing May Be Key

The New York Times
October 26, 2009
Adam Liptak writes that although many LGBT equality advocates have expressed concern over the timing of Ted Olson and David Boies' federal challenge to Prop. 8, some political analysts now see U.S. Judge Vaughn R. Walker's courtroom questions and refusal to dismiss the suit as possibly promising. [Link]

Read More »

Judge Denies Anti-Gay Prop. 8 Backers Delay on Memos

San Francisco Chronicle
October 26, 2009
U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker on Friday said supporters of Prop. 8 may not delay in handing over campaign strategy documents to plaintiffs in the legal challenge to the initiative looking for evidence of anti-gay bias as they try to overturn it. [Link]

Read More »

Op-Ed:  National Organization for Marriage Shows Its True Colors - Sues State of Maine to Change Rep

Californians Against Hate
October 22, 2009

Fred Karger of Californians Against Hate says, "These people [NOM] come into Maine from Washington, DC fully aware of the state election laws, pay $350,000 to professional signature gatherers to qualify their referendum to take away the rights of a minority, and then have the audacity to sue the state to change its years-old election laws." [Link]

Read More »

Anti-Gay Group Wants to Hide Donors in Washington State R-71 Campaign

The Associated Press
October 22, 2009

An anti-gay political action committee called the Family PAC filed a federal lawsuit on Wednesday, arguing that the group should be exempt from the state's campaign finance laws and not have to report the names of donors who contribute to their side of the Referendum 71 campaign. [Link]

Read More »

Justices Uphold Ban on Releasing Names on Washington State Petition

The New York Times
October 20, 2009
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday voted 8-1 to uphold an order that prevents Washington state from releasing the names of people who signed petitions for Referendum 71. The injunction against releasing the names will remain in place at least until parties involved file new motions. [Link]

Support expanded domestic partnership rights in Washington here.

Read More »

Justice Blocks Names in Washington State Ballot Measure

The Associated Press
October 19, 2009
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy on Monday temporarily blocked Wash. state officials from releasing the names of people who signed petitions for Referendum 71. Justice Kennedy said his order would remain in effect while he considers a request by the anti-gay group Protect Marriage Washington to reverse a federal appeals court ruling last week that ordered the release of the names. [Link]

Support Washington State domestic partnerships here.

Read More »

Ninth Circuit Reverses Decision on R-71 Signatures

The Stranger
October 15, 2009

The state has won a case to release the names and addresses of people who signed the petitions for Referendum 71, says Washington Attorney General's office spokeswoman Janelle Guthrie, but the signatures will not be immediately released. (Link)

Read More »

« First  <  63 64 65 66 67 >  Last »