Gays decry Obama’s stand on marriage equality case
By support
Jun 15, 2009 at 01:01 am
June 12, 2009
Gay rights groups expressed dismay with the Obama administration Friday over its championing of the Defense of Marriage Act, a law the president pledged to try to repeal while on the campaign trail. The government filed a motion late Thursday to dismiss the case of Arthur Smelt and Christopher Hammer, who are challenging the 1996 federal act. The law prevents couples in states that recognize same-sex unions from securing Social Security spousal benefits, filing joint taxes and other federal rights of marriage. "The president made very explicit and emphatic campaign promises that he opposes DOMA and would provide leadership calling on Congress to repeal it," said Jennifer Pizer, marriage project director for Lambda Legal. "This brief is not consistent with that promise." [Link]
Quick Links
Learn why marriage matters to gay couples.
Our plan to win marriage nationwide.
Find out how DOMA hurts.
Blogroll
- AmericaBlog Gay
- Andrew Sullivan
- Bilerico Project
- Box Turtle Bulletin
- California Ripple Effect
- Daily Kos
- Equal Justice Under Law
- Equality Matters
- Family Equality Council
- Firedoglake
- Gay Rights Change.org
- glaadBlog
- Good As You
- HRC Back Story
- Huffington Post
- Immigration Equality
- Joe My God
- Let California Ring
- Mombian
- NCLR's Blog
- New Civil Rights Movement
- PageOneQ
- Pam's House Blend
- Rod 2.0
- The Contributor
- The PFLAG National Blog
- The Republic of T.
- The Seattle Lesbian
- The Tin Man
- Wonk Room
- To Form A More Perfect Union
- Towleroad
Categories
- 2012 Ballot States
- Ben & Jerry's
- Abroad
- Women
- Conservatives
- New York
- Senior Citizens
- New Mexico
- North Carolina
- Florida
- Arkansas
- Bisexuals
- Delaware
- Ohio
- Oregon
- New Hampshire
- Michigan
- civil union
- Pennsylvania
- Non-Gay Allies
- California
- Latinos
- Connecticut
- Missouri
- Democrats: Say I Do
- Hawaii
- Youth
- DOMA Couples
- Texas
- Maine
- Maryland
- Rhode Island
- Washington D.C.
- Political Parties
- Religion and Faith
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- New Jersey
- Labor and Workplace
- Asians and Pacific Islanders
- Familia es Familia
- Washington
- Wisconsin
- Colorado
- Freedom to Serve
- Idaho
- Nebraska
- Montana
- Georgia
- Massachusetts
- Oklahoma
- North Dakota
- Minnesota
- Indiana
- South Dakota
- Louisiana
- NewTag
- DataPortability
- Mississippi
- Nevada
- South Carolina
- Illinois
- Arizona
- Video Blog
- Binational Couples
- Children and Families
- West Virginia
- States
- Utah
- African-Americans
- Wyoming
- Alaska
- Marc Solomon
- Kansas
- Native Americans
- Tennessee
- Mayors for the Freedom to Marry
- Virginia
- Transgender
- Michael Crawford
- Progressives
- Alabama
- Vermont
- National Engagement Party
- Ad
- Business
- Census
- Civil Rights
- Constitutions
- Divorce
- DOMA
- Economics
- Election 2004
- Election 2006
- Election 2008
- Election 2009
- Election 2010
- Election 2011
- Election 2012
- En espanol
- Endorsements
- Evan Wolfson
- Events
- Federal
- Freedom to Marry Week
- Fundraising
- Getting Involved
- GOVESRSER
- Hate Crimes
- Health
- Healthcare
- History
- Homepage Update
- Humor
- Immigration
- International
- Republicans
- Jerrold Nadler
- Judicial
- Legislative
- Sean Eldridge
- Loving v. Virginia
- Marriage vs. Other Forms of Protection
- Opinions
- Opposition
- Staff Spotlight
- Story Center Families
- Partner Organizations
- Personal Stories
- Summer for Marriage
- Supreme Court
- Podcast
- Poll
- Pop Culture
- President Obama
- Press Release
- Proposition 8
- Protections and Responsibilities of Marriage
- Puerto Rico
- Quote of the Week
- referendum
- Respect for Marriage Act
- Science, Medicine, and Social Sciences
- Sports
- Studies
- Tammy Baldwin
- Unions
- VFE Business-Labor
- VFE Entertainment
- VFE Government
- VFE Media
- VFE Religion
- VFE Social Justice
- Video
- Voices for Equality (VFE)
- Weddings
- Young Conservatives for the Freedom to Marry
- Why Marriage Matters