Maine Commission: NOM probe to continue
June 28, 2010
Posted by Kevin Miller on bangordailynews.com:
"The Maine Ethics Commission on Thursday rejected the National Organization for Marriage’s latest attempt to block an investigation of the group, adding yet another legal twist to a case that has been going since last October.
"The four members of the Ethics Commission voted unanimously to dismiss NOM’s argument that the commission lacked the authority to conduct an investigation into whether the organization should have registered as a 'ballot question committee.'
“'I have no doubt as soon as we make a decision that this, like our other decisions, will be appealed to Superior Court,' said commission chairman Walter McKee.
"NOM bankrolled most of last year’s successful campaign to overturn Maine’s freedom to marry law, funneling more than $1.9 million to the political action committee Stand for Marriage Maine.
"But NOM has been locked in regulatory and court battles with the Ethics Commission since the fall over whether the organization should be subject to Maine’s campaign finance laws. Requiring NOM to register as a ballot question committee could force the organization to disclose the identity of contributors.
"NOM representatives have argued that donations were to support the organization’s national fight against marriage equality, not to the Maine campaign in particular. But critics contend that NOM solicited donations specifically for the November 2009 vote in Maine and is merely trying to hide from the public the identities of its contributors.
"In the latest skirmish, NOM argued that the Ethics Commission lacked the legal means to conduct an investigation because the Maine statute authorizing investigations does not specifically include 'ballot question committees.'
"NOM’s attorney, Barry Bostrum, also repeated the organization’s claims that such an investigation could have a chilling effect on potential donors who would be reticent to contribute out of fear of possible backlash or retribution if their names became public.
"The commissioners disagreed, however, and quickly dismissed NOM’s motion after a brief presentation by commission staff and a representative from the Attorney General’s Office.
"McKee questioned why, if this was such a compelling issue to NOM, the organization didn’t raise it months ago."
Click to read the full post: [Link]