NOM fights state election laws to run anti-gay ads
Oct 22, 2010 at 12:00 pm
Posted with contribution from AP writer Eric Tucker on nytimes.com:
"A national anti-freedom to marry group that wants to run political ads unencumbered by some election law requirements amped up its fight Thursday in two states, including New York, where Republican gubernatorial candidatehas taken heat for opposing marriageg equality.
"The Washington, D.C.-based National Organization for Marriage has filed several lawsuits around the country, inspired in part by a landmarkdecision earlier this year that made it easier for corporations and unions to spend money in elections.
"A major financial backer of campaigns opposing marriage for same-sex couples, the group has said it wants to use radio and TV ads and direct mailing in governor races and legislative elections.
"In Buffalo on Thursday, a federal judge reserved decision after a NOM lawyer argued it would be unconstitutional to regulate the group as a political committee because it's not controlled by a candidate and doesn't spend most of its money on candidates.
... "According to court papers, one of the prepared ads features a girl named Emily saying that she learned in school 'about a prince who married a prince.'
"'And I can marry a princess!' she says.
"'Kids have enough to deal with already, without pushing gay marriage on them,' the narrator says. The New York version urges listeners to vote for Paladino, who polls show is trailing Democrat.
"'This case is not about marriage,' New York NOM attorney Randy Elf told U.S. District Judge Richard Arcara in Buffalo. 'Instead, it's about free speech.'
"Outside the courtroom, Elf said his arguments could apply to any organization, including ones that advocate the freedom to marry. Under New York election law, he said, any organization that spends $1,000 on express advocacy is considered a political committee and is subject to cumbersome reporting requirements.
"'This case isn't about disclosing donors. The challenge is whether it's constitutional to regulate organizations as full-fledged political committees,' he said.
"An attorney for state elections officials said treating NOM differently than the other 10,000 or so political committees in New York this close to Nov. 2 'would turn the statewide election on its head.'
"'The Board of Elections wants a transparent, clean election,' attorney Ken Manning said, 'and they feel that outweighs the plaintiff's interest in secrecy.'
... "NOM recently lost its legal challenge in Maine, Elf said, but it's appealing. At least one other lawsuit, in Florida, is pending."
Click to read the full post: [Link]