The Obama Administration Defends the Defense of Marriage Act
By support
Jun 18, 2009 at 08:09 am
June 17, 2009
During the Presidential election campaign, Barack Obama announced his intention to sign legislation repealing DOMA. Yet in Smelt, his Justice Department vigorously defended DOMA last week, prompting LGBT rights groups to denounce the seeming change of heart. Did the government's brief in Smelt betray the President's campaign promise? The President arguably has a duty to defend the constitutionality of duly-enacted statutes. Still, the executive branch's defense of a federal statute invariably has a substantial policy element to it. The problem was not so much that the government defended DOMA, as it was the way in which the government did so. Although the government's Smelt brief does not flatly violate candidate Obama's promise to seek DOMA's repeal, the LGBT community is right to view it as a betrayal of the spirit of that promise. [Link]
Quick Links
Learn why marriage matters to gay couples.
Our plan to win marriage nationwide.
Find out how DOMA hurts.
Blogroll
- AmericaBlog Gay
- Andrew Sullivan
- Bilerico Project
- Box Turtle Bulletin
- California Ripple Effect
- Daily Kos
- Equal Justice Under Law
- Equality Matters
- Family Equality Council
- Firedoglake
- Gay Rights Change.org
- glaadBlog
- Good As You
- HRC Back Story
- Huffington Post
- Immigration Equality
- Joe My God
- Let California Ring
- Mombian
- NCLR's Blog
- New Civil Rights Movement
- PageOneQ
- Pam's House Blend
- Rod 2.0
- The Contributor
- The PFLAG National Blog
- The Republic of T.
- The Seattle Lesbian
- The Tin Man
- Wonk Room
- To Form A More Perfect Union
- Towleroad
Categories
- 2012 Ballot States
- Ben & Jerry's
- Abroad
- Women
- Conservatives
- New York
- Senior Citizens
- New Mexico
- North Carolina
- Florida
- Arkansas
- Bisexuals
- Delaware
- Ohio
- Oregon
- New Hampshire
- Michigan
- civil union
- Pennsylvania
- Non-Gay Allies
- California
- Latinos
- Connecticut
- Missouri
- Democrats: Say I Do
- Hawaii
- Youth
- DOMA Couples
- Texas
- Maine
- Maryland
- Rhode Island
- Washington D.C.
- Political Parties
- Religion and Faith
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- New Jersey
- Labor and Workplace
- Asians and Pacific Islanders
- Familia es Familia
- Washington
- Wisconsin
- Colorado
- Freedom to Serve
- Idaho
- Nebraska
- Montana
- Georgia
- Massachusetts
- Oklahoma
- North Dakota
- Minnesota
- Indiana
- South Dakota
- Louisiana
- NewTag
- DataPortability
- Mississippi
- Nevada
- South Carolina
- Illinois
- Arizona
- Video Blog
- Binational Couples
- Children and Families
- West Virginia
- States
- Utah
- African-Americans
- Wyoming
- Alaska
- Marc Solomon
- Kansas
- Native Americans
- Tennessee
- Mayors for the Freedom to Marry
- Virginia
- Transgender
- Michael Crawford
- Progressives
- Alabama
- Vermont
- National Engagement Party
- Ad
- Business
- Census
- Civil Rights
- Constitutions
- Divorce
- DOMA
- Economics
- Election 2004
- Election 2006
- Election 2008
- Election 2009
- Election 2010
- Election 2011
- Election 2012
- En espanol
- Endorsements
- Evan Wolfson
- Events
- Federal
- Freedom to Marry Week
- Fundraising
- Getting Involved
- GOVESRSER
- Hate Crimes
- Health
- Healthcare
- History
- Homepage Update
- Humor
- Immigration
- International
- Republicans
- Jerrold Nadler
- Judicial
- Legislative
- Sean Eldridge
- Loving v. Virginia
- Marriage vs. Other Forms of Protection
- Opinions
- Opposition
- Staff Spotlight
- Story Center Families
- Partner Organizations
- Personal Stories
- Summer for Marriage
- Supreme Court
- Podcast
- Poll
- Pop Culture
- President Obama
- Press Release
- Proposition 8
- Protections and Responsibilities of Marriage
- Puerto Rico
- Quote of the Week
- referendum
- Respect for Marriage Act
- Science, Medicine, and Social Sciences
- Sports
- Studies
- Tammy Baldwin
- Unions
- VFE Business-Labor
- VFE Entertainment
- VFE Government
- VFE Media
- VFE Religion
- VFE Social Justice
- Video
- Voices for Equality (VFE)
- Weddings
- Young Conservatives for the Freedom to Marry
- Why Marriage Matters